Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is an infection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis which is clinically asymptomatic with negative finding on M. tuberculosis culture and smear, but with positive results on tuberculin skin test (TST) and/or interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) [1]. Incidence rate and mortality of M. tuberculosis infection in solid organ transplantation (SOT) group are 20 to 70 times and 10 times higher than those in the immunocompetent group, respectively [2,3]. Therefore, accurate diagnosis of LTBI in time is crucial to manage complication and survival rates of SOT group [2-5]. Although concentration of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) is expected to be low when immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is introduced [6-8], a comparative study of IGRA levels between pre-SOT status and post-SOT has not been reported yet. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine quantitative interval change of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) in SOT patients who previously had reactive IGRA but not taken LTBI treatment.

The study protocol was approved by Samsung Medical Center Ethics Review Committee (No. 2016-04-076). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

We prospectively included 169 patients with primary organ failure and awaiting SOT from February to August 2017 at Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea). Diagnosis of LTBI was made primarily by IGRA using QFT-Plus. Among 169 patients, 20 patients diagnosed with LTBI were included consecutively in this study for evaluating quantitative interval change of QFT-Plus. Based on clinician's discretion, these 20 patients did not receive LTBI treatment before transplantation. Patients' medical records including previous tuberculosis history, microbiological studies, and concomitant immunosuppression were reviewed. QFT-Plus assays (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Within 4 hours of whole blood collection in lithium heparin tubes, each milliliters of whole blood was transferred to M. tuberculosis antigen tubes (TB1 and TB2) Nil, and Mitogen tubes. These tubes were incubated immediately at 37°C for 20 hours. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for quantitation of IFN-γ was performed using a DS-2 automated ELISA processor (Dynex, Chantilly, VA, USA). Results were interpreted as positive when the antigen tube (either TB1 or TB2 for QFT-Plus) minus Nil IFN-γ concentration was ≥0.35 IU/mL and ≥25% of the Nil value. Test results with Nil IFN-γ concentration over 8.0 IU/mL or mitogen IFN-γ concentration less than 0.5 IU/mL were considered as indeterminate. Data are expressed as a number of positive results (percentage) or median, range, and/or interquartile range of quantitative IFN-γ results. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS ver. 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). All reported P-values were two-tailed and calculated with statistical significance set at a P-value of less than 0.05.

Introduction of immunosuppressant in SOT made it possible to prevent acute graft rejection and to help achieving high survival rate without devastating immune reaction [9,10]. On the other hand, instead of permitting immune tolerance, immunosuppressant also arouses many kinds of complication such as neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and other metabolic side effects [11]. Most of all, immunosuppression can stir up the immune system and make a patient susceptible to infection [10,11]. Therefore, SOT patients taking IST are still at risk of active or latent TB infection by exposure [2-4]. IGRA becomes useful tool to monitor and to diagnose LTBI not only in immunocompetent individuals but also in SOT patients. Diagnosis and treatment guidelines for latent tuberculosis have been revised to insist the role of IGRA in many countries including Korea [4,12]. Because negative TST or IGRA cannot exclude the potential LTBI, it is recommended to use both diagnostic tools complementarily and to combine the radiological findings and previous treatment history, particularly in immunocompromised subjects. LTBI treatment is indicated in SOT patients who are taking immunosuppressant or being planned to take immunosuppressant. Previous reports have shown the reduced reactivity in immunosuppressed patients including SOT recipients [13], however, sequential studies of pre-SOT and post-SOT IGRA in same individuals are rarely reported. For this, we've studied 20 patients who did not receive LTBI treatment before transplantation base on clinician's decision. While TB prophylaxis is recommended to patients who are diagnosed LTBI and awaiting organ transplantation according to 2017 revised Korean guideline which published at the beginning of 2018 “Diagnosis and Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: The Updated 2017 Korean Guidelines [12],” the study designed and prospectively recruit the patients with primary organ failure from February to August 2017 and TB prophylaxis was determined according to past history, imaging of the chest with computerized tomography scan or X-ray.

Herein, we compared results between pre-SOT status and post-SOT status with QFT-Plus. In this sequential test, eleven (55%) out of 20 patients had nonreactivity after transplantation. Discrepant result between pre-SOT status and post-SOT status with QFT-Plus and about 34% of reduction rate between pre- and posttransplantation status in the same reactivity group may indicate that the risk of false-negative could expressively increase after IST and this study would be a good example of IST effect on IGRA. Although effects on QFT-Plus induced by types of donor, combination of IST regimen, leukopenia and hypoalbuminemia were uncertain in this report, significant differences between concordant and discordant groups were observed in distributed levels of IFN-γ. Patients who had low IFN-γ levels in pretransplantation work-up (less than 1.07 IU/mL for TB1 and less than 3.02 IU/mL for TB2) became nonreactive during posttransplantation period (which were considered false negative results). Thus, clinicians need to interpret results of posttransplantation IGRA carefully by combining clinical findings with other laboratory results such as TST and chest radiology.

By presenting significant interval changes of IFN-γ between pre- and posttransplantation work-up in this report, we emphasize not only the importance of LTBI work-up before transplantation, but also the necessity of more sensitive test to detect MTB-specific immune response. QFT-Plus has two M. tuberculosis-specific antigen coated tubes called TB1 and TB2. TB1 contains long peptides of ESAT-6 and CFP-10 while TB2 contains six short peptides in addition to the same components in TB1, thus inducing both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell immune responses [13]. Although QFT-Plus is a new generation of QuantiFERON-TB Gold in Tube which is expected to improve the sensitivity [14,15], QFT-Plus seems to be insufficient for detecting MTB-specific cytokine responses in SOT patients undertaking IST. Several studies have suggested that diagnostic efficacy can be improved by measuring more than two cytokines or by combining specific cytokines such as interleukin-2, monocyte chemotactic protein 2, interferon gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10), granzyme B, and tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 14 [16,17]. Among them, IFN-γ IP-10 has been shown to be more sensitive than IFN-γ, particularly in immunosuppressed patients [17-19]. Thus, in the near future, we need TB-specific immune test to measure new cytokine alone or in combination with IFN-γ that is optimized for immune compromised patient population. This study included a relatively small number of patients with a short follow up period. Thus, larger longitudinal study with longer follow-up may be needed to elucidate the clinical consequence of altered sensitivity of current IGRA. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comparative study of IGRA levels between pre-SOT status and post-SOT in the same individuals.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: HYO, WH, HRJ, JWJ, JMK, GSC, SJK, JBP, KWL, DHS, JOC. Data curation: MJJ. Formal analysis: SJY, WKK. Methodology: JL. Project administration: ESK. Visualization: SJY. Writing-oritianl draft: SJY. Writing- review & editing: ESK.